Fintech is the vertical where consumer-grade design expectations crash into compliance, security and audit requirements that consumer apps never have to deal with. Most fintech UIs in the Irish market are either pretty and non-compliant, or compliant and unusable. The work is to be both. Done well, the design becomes a trust signal — and trust is the single most expensive thing a fintech has to buy.
What's Different About Designing for Fintech
The screen is regulated
Disclosures, warnings, suitability language, fee transparency, SCA flows — many of the words on the page are mandated, not chosen. Design has to make required text feel intentional, not bolted on.
The customer is sceptical
Fintech buyers expect to be fleeced and watch for it. Every loose end, awkward interaction or unexplained step reads as a red flag, not a UX bug.
The security team has veto
Patterns that work fine in consumer apps — biometric shortcuts, persistent sessions, autofill — often get rejected outright. The design has to anticipate this and design around it from the start.
The data is sensitive
Account numbers, IBANs, balances, transaction history. Display patterns, masking, copy-to-clipboard behaviour and screenshot handling all need explicit thought rather than defaults.
The Four Surfaces That Carry the Weight
Almost every Irish fintech we have worked with has the same four surfaces doing most of the work. Get these right and the rest of the product looks after itself.
Marketing site & product overview
What you do, who it is for, what it costs, what makes it safe. Fintech buyers read these pages forensically. They are not where you hide complexity.
Onboarding & KYC flow
The single highest-drop-off surface in the product. Designed well, it explains why each step exists. Designed badly, it feels like an interrogation.
Account & transaction dashboard
The screen customers spend the most time on after sign-up. Balance clarity, transaction grouping, search, export — small UX choices here drive support volume more than any other surface.
Payment & SCA confirmation
The few seconds where trust either holds or breaks. Strong Customer Authentication done badly creates fraud-feeling friction. Done well it feels like routine security.
Patterns We Use Repeatedly in Fintech
- Progressive disclosure for compliance text. Required disclaimers and warnings go on the page in plain English, with the full regulatory wording one click away. Both audiences get what they need without the page becoming a wall of small print.
- State-first dashboards. The dashboard answers "what changed since last time?" before "what does everything look like?". Most fintech customers open the app to check one thing, not browse.
- Confirmation-by-default for irreversible actions. Transfers, KYC submissions, account closures. The friction is the feature, not a UX failure.
- Explained empty states. A new account with no transactions yet is not a dead screen — it is an opportunity to explain how the product will look once it is being used.
- Honest error language. "Your payment was declined by your bank" is more useful than "Something went wrong." Generic errors in fintech read as guilty silence.
What We Have Shipped
The closest comparable engagement on the portfolio is Emerald Tech Solutions — a B2B technology business with a similar mix of trust-heavy marketing site, signed-up-user dashboard, and conversion-critical compliance content. The same playbook applies to fintech with the regulatory layer added on top.
We are designers, not solicitors or compliance officers. We do not write the regulatory text. We design around it — making sure the required content reads, scans and converts as well as the marketing copy. The legal sign-off stays with your compliance team.
The Three Decisions That Most Affect a Fintech Project
White-label or own brand?
A licensed BaaS product behind your brand is a very different design exercise from a fully owned full-stack fintech. We need to know the answer before scoping.
Native app or web-first?
Driven by customer expectation and security posture more than by the design. Either is workable; deciding late is what costs money.
Onboarding inside vs outside the app?
KYC and onboarding through a hosted provider versus a designed-in-house flow is a major branching point. Both can be done well — they need different design effort.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you have a Central Bank of Ireland background?
No — we partner with compliance specialists for the regulatory side. Our job is the design that surrounds and presents the compliant content. That separation is healthier than pretending to do both.
Can you work inside our existing design system?
Yes. Many fintechs use a hosted UI kit or a parent-company system. We design components and screens that fit cleanly into those.
Do you handle accessibility?
Yes. WCAG 2.2 AA is the floor for fintech in Ireland and we design to it. Higher conformance levels available on request.
What size of fintech do you work with?
From pre-Series-A teams sharpening their MVP to established licensed firms rebuilding a tired customer dashboard. Different proportions of work, same five-phase process.
Have a fintech project that needs digital design done properly?
The free audit looks at your current customer-facing surfaces and tells you which one is leaking trust the fastest. One working day, no pitch.
Request the free audit